Colorado’s popular universal school meals program could be cut back. Lawmakers’ solution hinges on voter support.

An aerial view of food in a school cafeteria.
Colorado's Healthy School Meals for All program would face cuts if voters don't approve proposed referendums expected to be on November's ballot. (RJ Sangosti / The Denver Post)

Sign up for Chalkbeat Colorado’s free daily newsletter to get the latest reporting from us, plus curated news from other Colorado outlets, delivered to your inbox.

Colorado’s popular universal free school meals program could face substantial cuts next year if voters don’t approve a measure for additional funding.

The state is facing challenges on two fronts with the Healthy School Meals for All program: less overall revenue for the program than it costs to run and a $1.2 billion budget shortfall that requires cuts to state programs and won’t provide enough money to cover the program’s operations.

Joint Budget Committee lawmakers released a $43.9 billion budget proposal on Monday that includes accompanying legislation to address the program’s funding.

In the best case scenario, voters approve more revenue for the program and the state avoids cuts. In the worst case, state cutbacks would mean only some schools would be eligible to get money for free lunches.

In 2022, Colorado voters allowed the state to raise revenue to make breakfast and lunch free for all students regardless of family income by lowering a tax credit for taxpayers making more than $300,000 a year.

In the first year, funding fell short by $56 million. Lawmakers covered the gap and have continued to do so as the demand for meals soared. Next year, lawmakers will no longer be able to cover costs through the state’s education savings.

The state budget estimates the program will need $151 million next year, but the state will only collect $108.8 million.

The bill would reduce additional state funding to $8 million, enough money to maintain the program through December.

Then the bill spells out two scenarios.

In the first, lawmakers pass House Bill 1274, which is already under consideration and sends two referendums before voters in November to raise more money for the program.

The first referendum would ask voters to approve allowing the state to retain money for the program that typically must be refunded to taxpayers due to the state’s cap on spending.

The second referendum would ask voters to expand the program by increasing taxable income on those who earn over $300,000 a year. A financial analysis of the bill estimates that referendum would generate more than $95 million each year for the school meals program.

The state would collect enough money for the program to maintain services statewide, according to budget projections.

In the second scenario, if the referendum doesn’t pass, only schools that currently participate in the federal Community Eligibility Provision program would qualify for meals free of charge. Schools where at least 25% of the population qualifies for the federal free or reduced lunch pricing threshold would also receive funding.

Students at other schools would have to fill out a federal form to receive free or reduced meals.

Jason Gonzales is a reporter covering higher education and the Colorado legislature. Chalkbeat Colorado partners with Open Campus on higher education coverage. Contact Jason at [email protected].

The Latest

DPSCD is already phasing out some small schools. But various solutions are being weighed for others.

The state spent around $497 million on the Choice Scholarship program in 2024-25, an increase of just over $58 million from the previous year.

Officials hope the new role will help create a pipeline of new school safety agents, a workforce that has declined 28% over the past five years. Critics say teens should not be involved in school safety.

The Trump administration wants to end funding for the federal TRIO program, which helps students from low-income backgrounds, students with disabilities, and first-generation students get to and through college.

No one told me ‘you’ll miss cafeteria noise,’ or ‘you’ll feel phantom pain for your walkie talkie,’ but I did.

The new group, created by state lawmakers, will issue recommendations later this year on how charter schools and IPS can share transportation and facility resources.